How to choose an ICP for B2B SaaS using evidence

Compare sales, retention, product use and economics to choose a B2B SaaS ICP, make exclusions explicit and test the gaps before committing budget.
Choose a B2B SaaS ideal customer profile by comparing which customers get value from the product, keep paying and can be served profitably. Then check whether you can reach more of them at a cost and pace the business can support. The decision should name who gets priority, who does not, and what evidence could change your mind.
An ICP describes the organisations you want to pursue and the conditions that make them a good fit. A buyer's job title helps you find the right person inside those organisations, but it cannot settle which segment deserves your budget.
1. Define the segments you are actually choosing between
Start with plausible alternatives from your customer base and sales pipeline. Write each as a combination of a problem, a buying situation and the requirements your product must meet.
For example, a workflow software company might compare agencies coordinating recurring client approvals with in-house teams managing occasional approval projects. This is a hypothetical choice, but it gives the analysis something useful to test: whether frequency and working context explain differences in value.
Use company size or industry where they help explain those differences. Do not impose an employee cut-off simply because it makes a prospecting filter convenient.
Keep the initial definitions consistent while comparing results. If you redefine a segment around every successful customer, you will produce an attractive description without learning whether it predicts anything.
2. Bring five kinds of evidence together
Start with one account-level record joining CRM, billing, product and support data through a reliable customer ID. Include churned customers and lost opportunities, not just the accounts your team likes discussing.
Record the period, sample size and missing fields for each comparison. Where the product, price or sales process changed, separate the evidence before and after the change.
CRM: can these customers buy?
Compare opportunity conversion, sales-cycle length, deal value and reasons for loss or no decision. Define what counts as an opportunity, show wins and losses alongside percentages, and keep open deals visible rather than treating them as losses.
Check how each segment entered the pipeline. Strong conversion from founder introductions does not establish that a cold outbound campaign will perform similarly, while a segment sales rarely pursued may have too little evidence to judge.
Retention: do they keep paying?
Look at customer retention and recurring revenue retention separately. Gross revenue retention excludes expansion; net revenue retention includes it, so growing accounts can offset revenue lost elsewhere. ChartMogul's definitions explain this distinction and how its reporting handles reactivations.
Compare customers at similar points after purchase, with their contract and renewal terms visible. An annual customer who has not reached renewal cannot yet demonstrate renewal behaviour.
Inspect individual accounts as well as averages. If one large expansion explains the segment's apparent strength, the decision depends heavily on that account.
Product use: are they getting the intended value?
Choose an observable action that reflects the product's useful work, such as completing an approval workflow. Compare time to that action, repeated use and how much help customers need to reach it.
Look at the account as well as individual users, and interpret frequency against the job the software does. A monthly reporting tool should not need daily logins to demonstrate useful adoption.
Usage is evidence of behaviour, not proof of the business outcome. Check whether customers describe the benefit you think that behaviour delivers.
Economics: is the revenue worth pursuing?
Put revenue beside the cost of delivering it. Include onboarding, support and any custom work, then examine acquisition cost and the time needed to recover it separately.
Where time or cost records are incomplete, use an explicit estimate or range. Do not make a lifetime-value estimate look settled when the cohort has barely had a chance to renew.
If the segment looks unattractive only at the current price or package, record that as a separate hypothesis. The SaaS pricing guide covers that decision; changing price and target customer together would make the result harder to interpret.
Customer conversations: what explains the pattern?
Speak to retained customers, customers who left and prospects who chose another option or did nothing. Ask what prompted the search, what they were doing before, who had to agree and what happened after implementation.
Use those accounts to investigate the numbers. If customers say the product saves time but support records show repeated manual intervention, resolve the contradiction rather than choosing the more flattering version.
3. Compare the evidence without inventing precision
Use this comparison template before the decision meeting. For each evidence item, complete both segment entries with the finding, its source and date, the number of accounts or opportunities observed, and the main limitation.
Problem and buying trigger, supported by conversations
Candidate segment A: To complete
Candidate segment B: To complete
Opportunity outcomes and sales-cycle timing, from CRM
Candidate segment A: To complete
Candidate segment B: To complete
Retention and expansion, from comparable billing cohorts
Candidate segment A: To complete
Candidate segment B: To complete
Useful product behaviour and assistance required
Candidate segment A: To complete
Candidate segment B: To complete
Revenue, delivery cost and acquisition economics
Candidate segment A: To complete
Candidate segment B: To complete
Reachable accounts and credible routes to buyers
Candidate segment A: To complete
Candidate segment B: To complete
Missing evidence most likely to change the decision
Candidate segment A: To complete
Candidate segment B: To complete
Avoid converting uncertain judgements into an unexplained score out of 100. A weighted total can conceal a requirement the product cannot meet or give an interview impression the same apparent authority as observed renewals.
Identify hard constraints first, then make the trade-offs explicit. Also check whether enough reachable accounts match the definition to support your commercial plan; a good fit among a handful of existing customers does not establish the size of the opportunity.
4. Separate customer fit from ease of acquisition
A segment can be easy to reach but expensive to serve. Another can get substantial value from the product while being difficult for your current team to acquire.
Consider a fictional comparison. Segment A comes through an established partner and closes quickly, but needs integrations the standard product does not support and struggles to use it without help. Segment B adopts the standard product and renews, but most wins have come through the founder's network.
The evidence supports stronger product fit for B, but leaves its repeatable acquisition route unproven. A sensible provisional choice could be to prioritise B, test a route beyond founder introductions, and stop actively pursuing A accounts that require unsupported integrations.
That is conditional on the business being able to fund the test. If it cannot, record the constraint rather than relabelling A as the ideal customer because it is easier to sell today.
5. Write the inclusion and exclusion decision
Turn the comparison into a short decision record that sales, marketing and product can use:
Prioritise: organisations with [problem], [buying trigger] and [requirements the current product supports].
Evidence: [observed buying, product use, retention and economics], with [limitations].
Do not actively pursue: [segment or condition], because [specific mismatch or constraint].
Still unknown: [assumption most likely to overturn the choice].
Next test: [action], owned by [person], with [evidence needed to continue, revise or stop].
Separate “poor fit”, “not a priority now” and “not enough evidence”. An account missing a CRM field should not become a bad-fit account by default.
Make the decision visible in targeting filters, qualification questions and campaign briefs. Give existing customers a separate service plan; deprioritising new acquisition does not remove your commitments to customers already paying you.
This is the practical value of shared customer understanding. In Forget the Funnel's discussion of strategic clarity, Georgiana Laudi argues that customer intelligence needs to become something teams can act on, rather than staying in the founder's head.
6. Test the uncertainty that matters most
If reachability is the gap, test whether a defined set of matching accounts can be reached through a credible channel and progress into qualified buying conversations. If onboarding is the gap, test whether new customers can complete the important workflow within your delivery capacity.
Set the budget, observation window and decision criteria before starting. Base them on your sales cycle and economics, and record which evidence would weaken the hypothesis as well as support it.
Keep segment definitions and qualification standards stable during the test. Where practical, change one major assumption at a time, and record differences in channel or sales support that could explain the result.
Replies and demo bookings can help test access or interest. They cannot establish retention, and a successful acquisition test should leave that question open until customers have had time to use and renew the product.
If you have very few customers, make a provisional choice from the evidence available and keep the commitment limited. The broader product-market-fit guide addresses whether the product is finding sustained demand; this comparison decides where to focus while you learn.
Revisit the choice when meaningful evidence arrives, such as renewals, repeated buying objections, a product change or acquisition costs that undermine the plan. The timing should follow the uncertainty you need to resolve.
Before rewriting campaigns or expanding outbound, complete the comparison and name the segment you will stop actively pursuing. If you need help making that decision, get in touch with the competing segments and the evidence you already have.
